The contemporary interest in retaining converts, expressed in both
popular and scholarly writings, is part of a long-standing concern for the
welfare of both individual Christians and churches. This concern is
justifiable on both theological and practical grounds.
Jesus often taught the need to persist in one's discipleship (Lk. 9:52;
14:25-35), and Paul was deeply concerned about the "bewitched" Galatian
Christians who were in danger of leaving faith to return to the "works of
the Law" (Gal. 3:1-5). A major thrust in both Hebrews and I Peter is to
urge Christians to remain steadfast. A major objective of the Revelation
was to cause Christians to overcome in the face of both religious and
civil opposition.
At a practical level, neither supporting churches nor individual
missionaries cherish the thought of investing years of work and enormous
financial outlays in an evangelistic effort only to have nothing remain of
that work two to four decades later.
Whether churches remain or disappear may be traced partially to human
effort since even though "God gives the growth" (I Cor. 3:6), His workers
"plant and water
(v. 6a). To shift metaphors, as Paul does in the same text, God laid the
foundation, Jesus Christ, but men "build on it" (3:10-15). The manner in
which they build can produce differing results (vs. 12-15). Accordingly,
Paul exhorted, "Let each man take care how he builds" (v. 10b). The focus
in this article is on the divine-human enterprise of producing durable
churches.
It is not an ignoble thing for churches to be reduced by death (Rev.
13:14) or economics. But it should be of great concern to evangelizers
when their own work may have a causative relationship to a church's
durability.
In modern times some groups have sought to produce committed and
long-term Christians by various discipleship programs which both precede
and follow baptism (Ortiz 1975; Jones 1982; Coleman 1964). These programs
have had mixed results, depending largely on the extent to which they
followed Scripture and the level of intensity and application.
Theoretically, people do not need to decide whether pre or post-baptismal
instruction is more determinative of longevity in Christ since both are
called for by the very nature of biblical Christianity. But what is of
concern here is the way in which individual Christians are formed into a
viable local congregation. Many missionaries have learned the painful
lesson that collecting a group of converts does not within itself
constitute a durable congregation.
It seems additionally possible for a group of people to experience
groupness and interrelatedness and still not remain as a viable church
(Breytenback 1986). A group must evidently have certain components which
will assist it in remaining vigorous and viable over time. Attention is
now focused on some of these variables.
Three-Self Formula. In the nineteenth century two missionary executives,
Henry Venn of the British Church Missionary Society and Rufus Anderson, a
North American Congregationalist, were concerned about the lack of viable
churches. They arrived almost simultaneously at what has been called the
three-self formula: self-support, self-government, and self-propagation,
terms created by Anderson. Theirs was a bold attempt to produce churches
that would remain steadfast, but often it did not work. Stephen Neill
argues that the premature withdrawal of the mission effort, leaving the
church in the hands of the "native pastorate" in Sierra Leone in 1860,
"inflicted on the Church a paralysis from which a whole century has not
availed to deliver it" (1964:260). That failure could have been because
the national preachers occupied a position which was alien to the local
culture. For a useful historical and theological analysis of the
hundred-year-old three-self formula, see Beyerhaus (1964).
Along this same line, Smalley has shown that a church in another culture
may achieve self-governing, self-supporting and self-propagating status
and still be culturally irrelevant. It may have been taught a form of
government, for example, which could be justified neither biblically nor
culturally. The national preachers can be a product of a preacher
training school whose curriculum is more suited to North America or
Western Europe than the country in which they function. Smalley (1958)
has clearly pointed out why churches may inaugurate the three-self formula
and still remain culturally irrelevant and non-viable. This is not to say
the three-self formula was always wrong within itself--only that it did
not cover all of the necessary components which produce lasting churches.
Three Basic Movements. Another approach to the stabilization of churches
is that of Daniel von Allmen (1975), a European then teaching in Sierra
Leone. In historical perspective, as Christianity moves into new
territory and eventually becomes relatively permanent, he claims, "it is
difficult to distinguish temporally successive states in the way things
developed;" but he feels three basic "movements" can be detected. (1)
First comes the missionaries, those who engage in hard-line and mostly
oral presentations of the Good News message. (2) Later, "translators" are
needed, those people who are capable of translating the received faith for
people of a different mentality (von Allmen 1975:42). Saayman presents
three postures for such work (1990). Among other things, this may involve
a faithful translation from Hebrew and Greek to the modern language in
question, but it also involves preaching and teaching.
(3) Eventually, a church needs an indigenous hymnody, what von Allmen
calls "the poets." Poetry and hymns have an emotional as well as an
intellectual component, and together make their way into the depths of the
human being. Who can assess the facility the Psalms gave first to Israel
and then to Christians who affirmed their faith? Von Allmen quotes Edmund
Schlink as saying "the basic structure of God talk is not the doctrine of
God but the worship of God." Both are necessary, but having an indigenous
hymnody is a significant component of having a durable church (Goudeau
1980).
Additionally, von Allmen contends (4) that the church needs its
"theologians," people who will be able to (a) serve the critical function
of distinguishing Christianity from its rivals--in a sense, defending the
faith--and (b) give some order to the expression of faith in the
particular culture. It would be their function to hold people close to
Christ in any and all of the discussions they may have about local
concerns, whether spiritism, crass idolatry, cargoism, ritual drunkenness,
etc.
Very often it is not until the second or third generation that new
churches begin to raise questions about the gaps in what they have been
taught. Often at that point reversion and syncretism occur. This raises
the question about how people may be produced in another culture who are
able to think both constructively and critically as they bring the
biblical message to bear upon their own culture. There is no simple or
singular answer to this need, but John Mbiti writes eloquently about the
African who went to Western Europe and learned English, German, Greek,
French, Latin, and Hebrew so he could study both the Bible and Bultmann,
Barth, Bonhoeffer, Buber, Kung, Moltmann, Niebuhr, and Tillich; but upon
returning to his native village as a
wonder boy he had absolutely nothing meaningful to say when his married
sister fell to the ground with a convulsion (Mbiti 1976). Long range
training programs must be well thought out.
It is obvious that durable churches must have a steady supply of
appropriate leaders. But leaders must be the type of people who are
accepted as leaders in their own culture. In North America, we produce
leaders in a kind of hothouse situation. In a number of cultures, one
must qualify biologically to be a leader. Consequently, leadership
training must be circumscribed by local concepts of leaders while being
rooted deeply in Scripture and the nature of Christianity itself. This is
a cultural specific which cannot be ignored if people are interested in
producing churches that remain over decades.
PRODUCING DURABLE CHURCHES
by
C. Philip Slate
Harding Graduate School of Religion
Memphis, Tennessee
UNCONTROLLABLE FACTORS
Evangelists cannot control or influence some factors which historically
have caused churches to decline and even disappear. War and economics can
force Christians to move to other areas in such numbers that the church is
decimated. Persecution can wipe out a church of very committed people.
The first wave of Nestorian work in China was completely destroyed by
force. In our day, Churches in Beirut have been decimated.COMMON SOLUTIONS
From the second century forward, and perhaps even in the first century
(Carrington 1940), many churches conducted oral instruction in preparation
for baptism and thus church membership (Buchanan 1974:199). The
instructional sections in the New Testament may have been presented both
before and after baptism. Michael Green (1970:154ff) offers a useful
discussion about the teachings on both sides of baptism and the underlying
desire to produce durable Christians. Although the catechism movement had
as a major purpose the production of meaningful and persistent membership,
it may be questioned whether a Western European catechism, for example,
has had that effect in other cultures.GROUPNESS
It is a given in the New Testament that although people may have been
"saved" individually they were ultimately to function as a part of a
group. Many of the metaphors of the church in the New Testament portray
an organism of interrelated parts (Minear 1960), an example of which is
found in Paul's metaphor of the body (Romans 12; I Corinthians 12). In
recent years various missiologists have called attention to the need of
"incorporation" and "organic growth" (Tippett 1973:149ff). Mellis (1976)
has argued vigorously for para-church "committed communities," but he has
in mind evangelistic groups rather than standing churches.CULTURAL SPECIFICS
The broad principles, like those described by von Allmen, need to be
adapted to culturally specific situations. The corrective measures Paul
took among the Jews, as exemplified in Galatians, were different from
those he had among the Gentiles, as exemplified in I Corinthians. While
there is one Gospel, there are multiple applications of its principles.
Sufficient time has not lapsed to give an accurate historical judgment on
it, but the three-stage, twenty-eight steps of church development
inaugurated among the Quiche churches of Christ in the Highlands of
Guatemala is a good example of being biblically rooted and culturally
specific. Ideally, each church was measured in terms of whether it had
taken all twenty-eight of those steps--from initial contact, testifying to
neighbors, and two or three families baptized, through such items as
baptizing their own converts, having five or six family heads baptized, to
the ability to discipline members as needed, practicing family worship,
and starting a daughter church.CONCLUSION
The effort to start and nurture churches so they will exist over time is
a challenging enterprise best carried out by people who are both informed
and see themselves as working together with God. Much can be learned from
churches and missionary societies that have done their work for 150 to 300
years, since sufficient time has passed to make good historical judgments.
But in all those cases one must be sensitive to the differing theological
postures occupied by the churches and missionary societies involved. Some
churches have built-in limitations on their efforts to produce durable
churches. The least contemporary workers can be expected to do is to be
personally righteous, well acquainted with the whole thrust of Scripture,
and missiologically informed.
Mirrored by permission of ACU Missions Personnel
Direct questions and comments to Ed Mathews,
![]()
Page maintained by